Reinstatement presupposes that the previous position from which the employee has been removed is still in existence or there is an unfilled position of a nature, more or less, similar to the one previously occupied by said employee.

The unilateral imposition of interests, at such rate that the lender or mortgagee so pleases, cannot and should not be reason to justify a foreclosure sale. The mortgagor should be given a chance to pay their indebtedness at an interest rate clearly agreed upon by the parties, otherwise, they shall be at the mercy of their creditor, standing to lose their property without being afforded a fair opportunity to settle their indebtedness.

Agency is extinguished by the death of either the principal or the agent. Thus, any act by the agent subsequent to the principal’s death is void ab initio, unless the act fell under the exceptions established under Articles 1930 and 1931 of the Civil Code.

Article 35 (2) of the Family Code provides that marriages officiated by person with no legal authority are considered void, except if one or both parties to the marriage believed in good faith that the officer had legal authority to solemnize the marriage.

In our criminal justice system, the overriding consideration is not whether the court doubts the innocence of the accused, but whether it entertains a reasonable doubt as to their guilt. Where there is no moral certainty as to their guilt, they must be acquitted even though their innocence may be questionable. The constitutional right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty can be overthrown only by proof beyond reasonable doubt.

According to the case of ELPIDIO QUE VS. PHILIPPINE HEART CENTER, G.R. No. 268308, April 02, 2025, a medical professional has the duty to observe the standard of care and exercise the degree of skill, knowledge, and training ordinarily expected of other similarly trained medical professionals acting under the same circumstances. A breach of the accepted standard of care constitutes negligence or malpractice and renders the defendant liable for the resulting injury to his patient.

Preventive suspension is not a penalty but a disciplinary measure to protect life or property of the employer or the co-workers pending investigation of any alleged infraction committed by the employee. Thus, it is justified only when the employee’s continued employment poses a serious and imminent threat to the employer’s or co-workers’ life or property. When justified, the preventively suspended employee is not entitled to the payment of his salaries and benefits for the period of suspension.

Under the old law, the adopted child cannot be considered as a relative of the ascendants and collaterals of the adopting parents. The relationship created is exclusively between the adopter and the adopted, and does not extend to the relatives of either.

The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals’ ruling that the informal structures operated by the spouses Calimlim on foreshore land in Matabungkay Beach constituted a public nuisance. Despite a lack of necessary permits and the existence of multiple notices to vacate, the spouses Calimlim continued their informal operations, causing obstruction, excessive noise, foul odor, and even fire hazards injurious to their neighboring property, the Villa Alexandra, among others.

The Supreme Court ruled that in drug-related cases, prosecutors are required to present all their objections to a proposed plea bargain at once; otherwise, any grounds not mentioned will be deemed waived.