In malversation through negligence, what characterizes the negligence is not what the offender did after the public funds or property were taken by another person but what the offender did or omitted to do which permitted the taking thereof.

The Court ruled that the workers were entitled to the same rights and benefits as regular employees of the employer. The decision was grounded in Articles 106 to 109 of the Labor Code, which prohibit labor-only contracting when the contractor lacks substantial capital and the workers are engaged in the employer’s core activities. Such arrangements violate labor laws and compromise workers’ rights.

As mandated under the POEA-SEC, as amended by POEA Memorandum Circular No. 10, Series of 2010, upon repatriation, the seafarer concerned shall be examined and treated by the company-designated physician. If the seafarer disagrees with the final assessment of the company-designated physician, the former may procure a second opinion from a physician of his or her choice. In case of a conflicting assessment, the parties may resort to a third doctor.

Willful disobedience or insubordination requires the concurrence of two (2) requisites: (1) the employee’s assailed conduct must have been willful which is characterized by a wrongful and perverse attitude; and (2) the order violated must have been reasonable, lawful, made known to the employee, and must pertain to the duties which he had been engaged to discharge.

Reinstatement presupposes that the previous position from which the employee has been removed is still in existence or there is an unfilled position of a nature, more or less, similar to the one previously occupied by said employee.

The unilateral imposition of interests, at such rate that the lender or mortgagee so pleases, cannot and should not be reason to justify a foreclosure sale. The mortgagor should be given a chance to pay their indebtedness at an interest rate clearly agreed upon by the parties, otherwise, they shall be at the mercy of their creditor, standing to lose their property without being afforded a fair opportunity to settle their indebtedness.

Agency is extinguished by the death of either the principal or the agent. Thus, any act by the agent subsequent to the principal’s death is void ab initio, unless the act fell under the exceptions established under Articles 1930 and 1931 of the Civil Code.

Article 35 (2) of the Family Code provides that marriages officiated by person with no legal authority are considered void, except if one or both parties to the marriage believed in good faith that the officer had legal authority to solemnize the marriage.

In our criminal justice system, the overriding consideration is not whether the court doubts the innocence of the accused, but whether it entertains a reasonable doubt as to their guilt. Where there is no moral certainty as to their guilt, they must be acquitted even though their innocence may be questionable. The constitutional right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty can be overthrown only by proof beyond reasonable doubt.

According to the case of ELPIDIO QUE VS. PHILIPPINE HEART CENTER, G.R. No. 268308, April 02, 2025, a medical professional has the duty to observe the standard of care and exercise the degree of skill, knowledge, and training ordinarily expected of other similarly trained medical professionals acting under the same circumstances. A breach of the accepted standard of care constitutes negligence or malpractice and renders the defendant liable for the resulting injury to his patient.