ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES

contact

MON-SAT 8:30AM-5:30PM

Jurisdiction of HSAC over Condominium Contract Disputes

In Cadungog v. Jung, the Supreme Court affirmed that the Human Settlements Adjudication Commission (HSAC) has exclusive jurisdiction over contractual and legal disputes between buyers and developers of real estate projects. The Court also clarified that this jurisdiction evolved through a series of legal reforms, including the transfer of regulatory functions from the National Housing Authority to the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board, and ultimately to the HSAC under Republic Act No. 11201.

Liability of Corporate Officers in Labor Cases

Section 30 of the Revised Corporation Code provides that directors or trustees who willfully and knowingly vote for or assent to patently unlawful acts of the corporation or who are guilty of gross negligence or bad faith in directing the affairs of the corporation or acquire any personal or pecuniary interest in conflict with their duty as such directors or trustees shall be liable jointly and severally for all damages resulting therefrom suffered by the corporation, its stockholders or members and other persons.

The Supreme Court decides: Preventive suspension of employee who locked company out of its own software is valid

Preventive suspension is not a penalty but a disciplinary measure to protect life or property of the employer or the co-workers pending investigation of any alleged infraction committed by the employee. Thus, it is justified only when the employee’s continued employment poses a serious and imminent threat to the employer’s or co-workers’ life or property. When justified, the preventively suspended employee is not entitled to the payment of his salaries and benefits for the period of suspension.

Revised Guidelines Governing the Employment and Working Conditions of Security Guards and the Private Security Services Industry Act

Under DOLE Department Order 150-16, Security Guard refers to any person who offers or renders personal service to watch or secure a residence, business establishment, building, compound, any other area or property; or inspects, monitors, or performs body checks or searches of individuals or baggage and other forms of security inspection. Private Security Personnel, on the other hand, refers to natural persons, including private detectives, security consultants and security officers, employed by private security agency or firm, to render security and/or detective services.

Anti-Plunder Act (R.A. No. 7080)

Photo from Pexels | Hiren Ranpara The following post does not create a lawyer-client relationship between Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices (or any of its lawyers) and the reader. It is still best for you to engage the services of a lawyer or you may directly contact and consult Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Read more about Anti-Plunder Act (R.A. No. 7080)[…]

Dominancy Test in Trademark (Kolin v. Kolin)

The Dominancy Test focuses on the similarity of the prevalent features of the competing trademarks which might cause confusion or deception, and thus infringement. If the competing trademark contains the main, essential or dominant features of another, and confusion or deception is likely to result, infringement takes place. Duplication or imitation is not necessary; nor is it necessary that the infringing label should suggest an effort to imitate. The question is whether the use of the marks involved is likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public or deceive purchasers.