The Battle of Crocs: Lacoste loses trademark dispute with Crocodile International
In deciding the trademark dispute between Lacoste and Crocodile International over the use of a crocodile device mark, the Supreme Court held that there exist distinct visual differences both in appearance and overall commercial impression between the marks which makes likelihood of confusion between them nil. The form, arrangement, general appearance, and overall presentation of their marks are evidently dissimilar, thus, the propensity to mistake one for the other is very low.
