ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES

contact

MON-SAT 8:30AM-5:30PM

The Supreme Court decides: Lawyers cannot be held liable for notarial violations unless there is clear evidence that they knowingly permitted the misuse of notarial commission.

Photo from Pexels | Kaboompics.com The following post does not create a lawyer-client relationship between Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices (or any of its lawyers) and the reader. It is still best for you to engage the services of a lawyer or you may directly contact and consult Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices Read more about The Supreme Court decides: Lawyers cannot be held liable for notarial violations unless there is clear evidence that they knowingly permitted the misuse of notarial commission.[…]

Rule on Examination of a Child Witness (A.M. No. 004-07-SC)

The Rule on Examination of a Child Witness shall govern the examination of child witnesses who are victims of crime, accused of a crime, and witnesses to crime. It shall apply in all criminal proceedings and non-criminal proceedings involving child witnesses.

The objectives of this Rule are to create and maintain an environment that will allow children to give reliable and complete evidence, minimize trauma to children, encourage children to testify in legal proceedings, and facilitate the ascertainment of truth.

[Department Order No. 251-25] New Implementing Rules And Regulations of Article 133 [135] of the Labor Code, as Amended by Republic Act No. 6725, Otherwise Known as “An Act Strengthening the Prohibition on Discrimination Against Women with Respect to Terms and Conditions of Employment,” and as Renumbered by Republic Act No. 10151″

[Download PDF] Department Order No. 251-25: New Implementing Rules And Regulations of Article 133 [135] of the Labor Code, as Amended by Republic Act No. 6725, Otherwise Known as “An Act Strengthening the Prohibition on Discrimination Against Women with Respect to Terms and Conditions of Employment,” and as Renumbered by Republic Act No. 10151″

Does the utterance of foul and abusive language against a supervisor amount to serious misconduct?

Photo from Pexels | cottonbro studio The following post does not create a lawyer-client relationship between Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices (or any of its lawyers) and the reader. It is still best for you to engage the services of a lawyer or you may directly contact and consult Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Read more about Does the utterance of foul and abusive language against a supervisor amount to serious misconduct?[…]

The Supreme Court decides: Where the accused security professional is licensed to exercise their profession and is equipped with a permit sanctioned by law, possession of the issued firearm under a belief in good faith that it is licensed is a valid defense in a case for illegal possession of firearm.

In the case of Hilario Cosme v. People of the Philippines, the Supreme Court held that where the accused security professional is licensed to exercise their profession and is equipped with a permit sanctioned by law, possession of the issued firearm under a belief in good faith that it is licensed is a valid defense in a case for illegal possession of firearm.