In recent months, the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been under harsh scrutiny by many Filipinos. Therefore, to give us a better understanding of what the ICC is and whether or not it has jurisdiction to try criminal cases here in our country, here are some key points gathered from the ICC’s booklet “Understanding the International Criminal Court”, published in 2020.
In the case of Austria v. AAA (G.R. No. 205275) the Supreme Court, in the exercise of its exclusive rule-making authority and the symbolic function to instruct the bench and the bar, formulated guidelines on the private offended parties’ legal personality to question judgments and orders in criminal proceedings.
In 2007, Rhys Palaganas (Rhys) was enrolled as a grade school student at Mother Goose School in Dagupan City, Pangasinan. He was classmates with Noel Fernandez (Noel) and Mark Dy (Mark).
On January 19, 2007, Noel lost his mechanical pencil during Music class. Rhys found Noel’s pencil and brought it home. Few days after, Noel noticed that Rhys was using his mechanical pencil during Filipino class. Noel allowed Rhys to use the pencil because Rhys had no pencil at that time. However, Rhys forgot to return the pencil at the end of the day.
In Lingganay v. Del Monte Land Transport Bus Company, G.R. No. 254976, August 20, 2024, the Supreme Court held that the dismissal of a bus driver involved in multiple road accidents is valid for transgressing the company rules and regulations on health and safety and for his gross and habitual neglect of his duties under Article 297 (b) of the Labor Code.
In the case of Dela Cruz v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 192221, November 13, 2012, the Supreme Court explained what happens to the votes cast for a nuisance candidate whose name was still included or printed in the official ballots on election day. Should the votes cast for such a nuisance candidate be considered stray or counted in favor of the bona fide candidate?
Section 14 of Republic Act No. 7166 requires every candidate to file his Statement of Contributions and Expenditures (SOCE). No person elected to any public offices shall enter upon the duties of his office until he has filed the same. In PDP-Laban v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 225152), the Supreme Court noted that the word “until” as used in Section 14 signifies that the prohibition to assume office is conditional and subject to the filing of the SOCEs.
On January 21, 2025, the Department of Labor and Employment issued Department Order No. 248 series of 2025 to regulate the employment of foreign nationals in the Philippines.
What is red-tagging? How does it threaten a person’s right to life, liberty or security? This was discussed in detail in the case of Deduro vs. Maj. Gen. Vinoya, promulgated by the Supreme Court on July 4, 2023.
A candidate is considered a Member of the House of Representatives when the following requisites concur: (1) a valid proclamation; (2) a proper oath; and (3) assumption of office.
In the case of Cambila, Jr. and Samad v. Seabren Security Agency, G.R. No. 261716, October 21, 2024, the Supreme Court has held that security guards working under a broken period scheme must be paid overtime if their break is too short for personal use.
