ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES

contact

MON-SAT 8:30AM-5:30PM

Impeachment vs. Quo Warranto

Under Article 11, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution, the President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Supreme Court, the Members of the Constitutional Commissions, and the Ombudsman may be removed from office, on impeachment for, and conviction of, culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust. All other public officers and employees may be removed from office as provided by law, but not by impeachment.

SC Upholds Validity of Unwritten Sale of Land

Photo from Unsplash | Frances Gunn The following post does not create a lawyer-client relationship between Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices (or any of its lawyers) and the reader. It is still best for you to engage the services of a lawyer or you may directly contact and consult Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Read more about SC Upholds Validity of Unwritten Sale of Land[…]

[Intern Insights] The Fire That Fear Lit

There’s a special kind of courage in choosing to show up even when you’re uncertain, in saying
yes to something new even when doubt whispers louder than confidence. That’s how my
internship journey began; not with grand certainty, but with quiet fear and a burning desire to
grow. I did it scared. I stepped closer to the flame, unsure if it would burn or refine me. And in
doing so, I found the fire I didn’t know I needed to ignite.

Independent Contractors

An independent contractor is one who carries a distinct and independent business and undertakes to perform the job, work, or service on its own account and under one’s own responsibility according to one’s manner and method, free from the control and direction of the principal in all matters connected with the performance of the work except as to the results thereof.

Use of familial terms shows the nature of the accused’s relationship to the victim (People of the Philippines vs. BBB254878, G.R. No. 254878, October 22, 2024)

In the case of People of the Philippines vs. BBB254878, G.R. No. 254878, October 22, 2024, the Supreme Court reiterated that the use of specific familial terms, like niece or uncle, is adequate to inform the accused of the nature of the relationship between him and the victim, thereby meeting the requirements of the law. There is no ambiguity in the case. The Information explicitly stated that:

(1) AAA was only 8 years old when the incident happened, and
(2) AAA is accused-appellant’s own niece.

While the Information did not specify the degree of relationship between AAA and accused-appellant, it nevertheless directly, and in layman’s terms, conveyed the nature of the relationship.